<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ditigal ist besser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kikuyumoja.com/2007/05/24/ditigal-ist-besser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kikuyumoja.com/2007/05/24/ditigal-ist-besser/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 09:37:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kikuyumoja</title>
		<link>http://kikuyumoja.com/2007/05/24/ditigal-ist-besser/comment-page-1/#comment-11394</link>
		<dc:creator>kikuyumoja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 13:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kikuyumoja.com/?p=1217#comment-11394</guid>
		<description>Eh, traaboool!

I use http://www.browsrcamp.com/ to check my layout under Safari..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, traaboool!</p>
<p>I use <a href="http://www.browsrcamp.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.browsrcamp.com/</a> to check my layout under Safari..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mentalacrobatics</title>
		<link>http://kikuyumoja.com/2007/05/24/ditigal-ist-besser/comment-page-1/#comment-11391</link>
		<dc:creator>Mentalacrobatics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 11:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kikuyumoja.com/?p=1217#comment-11391</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
In the end this whole internet thing is just a beautiful waste of time… :-)
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

yes yes yes a beautiful waste of time!
MSIE 6 + CSS = arrrrrrrrrgh

and now imagine all the MAC browsers, aiii. We are in problems!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
In the end this whole internet thing is just a beautiful waste of time… :-)
</p></blockquote>
<p>yes yes yes a beautiful waste of time!<br />
MSIE 6 + CSS = arrrrrrrrrgh</p>
<p>and now imagine all the MAC browsers, aiii. We are in problems!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenyangay</title>
		<link>http://kikuyumoja.com/2007/05/24/ditigal-ist-besser/comment-page-1/#comment-11390</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenyangay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 11:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kikuyumoja.com/?p=1217#comment-11390</guid>
		<description>Firefox is what I use and it works way much better than IE6</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox is what I use and it works way much better than IE6</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 58</title>
		<link>http://kikuyumoja.com/2007/05/24/ditigal-ist-besser/comment-page-1/#comment-11386</link>
		<dc:creator>58</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 06:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kikuyumoja.com/?p=1217#comment-11386</guid>
		<description>IE is way overrated. If it was my decision, we would just scrap the  whole thing along with office and switch to opensource software. Firefox, Camino and others are way better, and in terms of pricing the office suite is ridiculously expensive. There are much better (because the do the same and cost 1/10) options around such as the thinkfree suite and others. And true, it sucks to change stuff only for IE. I decided I&#039;m not gonna bother about that anymore. In fact I havent even looked at my site in IE ever. Should I?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE is way overrated. If it was my decision, we would just scrap the  whole thing along with office and switch to opensource software. Firefox, Camino and others are way better, and in terms of pricing the office suite is ridiculously expensive. There are much better (because the do the same and cost 1/10) options around such as the thinkfree suite and others. And true, it sucks to change stuff only for IE. I decided I&#8217;m not gonna bother about that anymore. In fact I havent even looked at my site in IE ever. Should I?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bankelele</title>
		<link>http://kikuyumoja.com/2007/05/24/ditigal-ist-besser/comment-page-1/#comment-11375</link>
		<dc:creator>bankelele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 10:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kikuyumoja.com/?p=1217#comment-11375</guid>
		<description>NOT in defence of IE6, but it&#039;s what is available on most computers we use. Maybe it all goes back to the Microsoft (anti-trust) case of a few years back, but almost all computers with any windows OS also come with IE. So IE6 is what we use in the office, in cyber cafes, on our laptops to browse. [and i&#039;m sure most web site stats will confirm that over 90% of traffic is still from IE browsers]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOT in defence of IE6, but it&#8217;s what is available on most computers we use. Maybe it all goes back to the Microsoft (anti-trust) case of a few years back, but almost all computers with any windows OS also come with IE. So IE6 is what we use in the office, in cyber cafes, on our laptops to browse. [and i'm sure most web site stats will confirm that over 90% of traffic is still from IE browsers]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

